Super City Logo Com­pet­i­tion 'Lost Opportunity'

The Design­ers Insti­tute of New Zea­l­and has expressed dis­ap­point­ment and con­cern that the design pro­fes­sion has not been involved in any con­sulta­tion to date about a pub­lic com­pet­i­tion to design a new logo for Auckland’s Super City.

Sean McGarry, pres­id­ent of dinz, the national organ­isa­tion rep­res­ent­ing pro­fes­sional design­ers, said that the brand­ing of the Super City was vitally import­ant for the future of the city as it would rep­res­ent Auck­land on a national and inter­na­tional stage. How­ever, he said that decid­ing a logo through such a com­pet­i­tion “under­mines the value of a qual­ity strategy-led design process.”

Mr McGarry points out that most high pro­file brands are the res­ult of com­plex strategy work. They have had the bene­fit of many pro­fes­sional hours of expert work inves­ted in them to make them look dis­tinct­ive, to pos­i­tion a city, com­pany or organ­isa­tion cor­rectly, and most import­antly, to con­vey the organisation’s values.

Said Mr McGarry: “Good design, while it might appear to look simple, is usu­ally the res­ult of inde­pth research, a num­ber of concept designs, and then a roll out of a com­plete iden­tity programme.”

He also quer­ied why there was not a pro­fes­sional brand­ing expert or pro­fes­sional designer on the judging panel, which includes art con­sult­ant Ham­ish Keith, artist Dick Frizzell, Waitakere Mayor Bob Har­vey and designer Karen Walker, among others.

You would think that the authors of this ini­ti­at­ive would have dot­ted the i’s and crossed the t’s through a pro­cess of design due dili­gence, con­sulta­tion and engagement.

The lack of vis­ion, pro­fes­sional engage­ment and con­sulta­tion with this whole pro­cess will make us look rather fool­ish when the eyes of the world turn to New Zea­l­and next year.”

Brand strategist and dinz mem­ber, Brian Richards, calls the com­pet­i­tion “MMP Design by pop­u­lar con­sent” and a “beauty con­test at best.”

Mr Richards said he could not ima­gine world class cit­ies such as Glas­gow, New York or Ber­lin throw­ing open their city’s brand­ing to a pub­lic com­pet­i­tion. He said the com­pet­i­tion will res­ult in a “logo car­ni­val with no cent­ral ethos or brand to explain the desired outcome.”

Cathy Ven­inga, Chief Exec­ut­ive of dinz, also described the com­pet­i­tion as a “lost opportunity.”

Auck­land is home to many world class brand strategy and graphic design firms, many of whom con­sist­ently win awards.… Let’s not even men­tion what such a com­pet­i­tion can poten­tially do to the cred­ib­il­ity of design and our inter­na­tional repu­ta­tion as a design led innov­at­ive nation.”

This entry was posted in news and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

5 Comments

  1. Posted 19 February 2010 at 18:17 | Permalink

    Indeed. Why not put the whole brand thing on the back­burner for awhile, and just come up with a vanilla logo­type to last the next x months?

    If you can handle a couple of tongue-in-cheek entries:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/markleggett/4366936082/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/reservoir/4368288899/

  2. Michael Barrett
    Posted 19 February 2010 at 20:26 | Permalink

    btw, the story above is a dinz press release. I just thought I'd give it some air time. More to come on this soon, there's a story in pro­gress. In the mean­time please jot any other thoughts…

  3. Posted 20 February 2010 at 23:13 | Permalink

    Nice Alex, my entry will prob­ably be some­thing min­im­al­ist like this:
    http://timdonaldson.com/entry.jpg

    I'd say it needs devel­op­ment though.

  4. Posted 23 February 2010 at 10:40 | Permalink

    Nice, Tim!
    Does it need any more work? Billy Apple would say no.
    Would be like that philo­soph­ical conun­drum: if a pub­lic agency pays quite a lot of money for a rebrand, but nobody can see any actual mark, can the news media still pour scorn and vox pop it up?

  5. Posted 24 February 2010 at 14:09 | Permalink

    The powers-that-be at Auck­land Coun­cils have decided that the best way to get the new Super City look­ing world-class is to hold a com­pet­i­tion for who can design the best logo. No brief, no cri­teria, no research, and no signs of a brand story/platform. Just a blank can­vas for any­one who fan­cies a crack to go wild with ideas and the chance to win the sum of 10,000 New Zea­l­and Dol­lars for the best graph­ics designz.

    Brian Richards (NZ Brand con­sult­ant) vali­antly went on Break­fast tele­vi­sion to explain that cre­at­ing a brand needs a pro­fes­sional and proven pro­cess and that the industry in New Zea­l­and would be more than cap­able of cre­at­ing a world-class iden­tity. He is abso­lutely right but I don’t think he went nearly far enough in his con­dem­na­tion. When is Local and National Gov­ern­ment going to stop embar­rass­ing us in front of the rest of the world?

    Auck­land is the gate­way to New Zea­l­and for most of our vis­it­ors – and some­times their only port-of-call – and there­fore should act and behave like a world-class city; a city New Zeal­anders can be proud of and not one of deri­sion. Instead vis­it­ors arrive to find an inac­cess­ible city with sub-standard archi­tec­ture, town plan­ning, road­ing, pub­lic trans­port (North­ern Busway with­stand­ing) and shop­ping facil­it­ies. In fact there isn't much bought and/or main­tained with pub­lic money that is well designed and fit-for-purpose.

    The form­a­tion of an Auck­land Super City is an oppor­tun­ity to right some of those wrongs and with the world’s eyes upon us dur­ing the Rugby World Cup in 2011 isn’t it time we attacked issues like these with foresight, ambi­tion and professionalism.

    For me the logo com­pet­i­tion is just the icing on the cake.

One Trackback

  1. […] paper, PDF) * Cor­sic­ana, TX cuts ser­vices but pro­tects brand­ing work * Auckland’s Super City logo pub­lic con­test back­lash * Place Pos­i­tion­ing & Brand­ing Toolkit (slide […]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image