The Designers Institute of New Zealand has expressed disappointment and concern that the design profession has not been involved in any consultation to date about a public competition to design a new logo for Auckland’s Super City.
Sean McGarry, president of dinz, the national organisation representing professional designers, said that the branding of the Super City was vitally important for the future of the city as it would represent Auckland on a national and international stage. However, he said that deciding a logo through such a competition “undermines the value of a quality strategy-led design process.”
Mr McGarry points out that most high profile brands are the result of complex strategy work. They have had the benefit of many professional hours of expert work invested in them to make them look distinctive, to position a city, company or organisation correctly, and most importantly, to convey the organisation’s values.
Said Mr McGarry: “Good design, while it might appear to look simple, is usually the result of indepth research, a number of concept designs, and then a roll out of a complete identity programme.”
He also queried why there was not a professional branding expert or professional designer on the judging panel, which includes art consultant Hamish Keith, artist Dick Frizzell, Waitakere Mayor Bob Harvey and designer Karen Walker, among others.
“You would think that the authors of this initiative would have dotted the i’s and crossed the t’s through a process of design due diligence, consultation and engagement.
“The lack of vision, professional engagement and consultation with this whole process will make us look rather foolish when the eyes of the world turn to New Zealand next year.”
Brand strategist and dinz member, Brian Richards, calls the competition “MMP Design by popular consent” and a “beauty contest at best.”
Mr Richards said he could not imagine world class cities such as Glasgow, New York or Berlin throwing open their city’s branding to a public competition. He said the competition will result in a “logo carnival with no central ethos or brand to explain the desired outcome.”
Cathy Veninga, Chief Executive of dinz, also described the competition as a “lost opportunity.”
“Auckland is home to many world class brand strategy and graphic design firms, many of whom consistently win awards.… Let’s not even mention what such a competition can potentially do to the credibility of design and our international reputation as a design led innovative nation.”










5 Comments
Indeed. Why not put the whole brand thing on the backburner for awhile, and just come up with a vanilla logotype to last the next x months?
If you can handle a couple of tongue-in-cheek entries:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/markleggett/4366936082/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/reservoir/4368288899/
btw, the story above is a dinz press release. I just thought I'd give it some air time. More to come on this soon, there's a story in progress. In the meantime please jot any other thoughts…
Nice Alex, my entry will probably be something minimalist like this:
http://timdonaldson.com/entry.jpg
I'd say it needs development though.
Nice, Tim!
Does it need any more work? Billy Apple would say no.
Would be like that philosophical conundrum: if a public agency pays quite a lot of money for a rebrand, but nobody can see any actual mark, can the news media still pour scorn and vox pop it up?
The powers-that-be at Auckland Councils have decided that the best way to get the new Super City looking world-class is to hold a competition for who can design the best logo. No brief, no criteria, no research, and no signs of a brand story/platform. Just a blank canvas for anyone who fancies a crack to go wild with ideas and the chance to win the sum of 10,000 New Zealand Dollars for the best graphics designz.
Brian Richards (NZ Brand consultant) valiantly went on Breakfast television to explain that creating a brand needs a professional and proven process and that the industry in New Zealand would be more than capable of creating a world-class identity. He is absolutely right but I don’t think he went nearly far enough in his condemnation. When is Local and National Government going to stop embarrassing us in front of the rest of the world?
Auckland is the gateway to New Zealand for most of our visitors – and sometimes their only port-of-call – and therefore should act and behave like a world-class city; a city New Zealanders can be proud of and not one of derision. Instead visitors arrive to find an inaccessible city with sub-standard architecture, town planning, roading, public transport (Northern Busway withstanding) and shopping facilities. In fact there isn't much bought and/or maintained with public money that is well designed and fit-for-purpose.
The formation of an Auckland Super City is an opportunity to right some of those wrongs and with the world’s eyes upon us during the Rugby World Cup in 2011 isn’t it time we attacked issues like these with foresight, ambition and professionalism.
For me the logo competition is just the icing on the cake.
One Trackback
[…] paper, PDF) * Corsicana, TX cuts services but protects branding work * Auckland’s Super City logo public contest backlash * Place Positioning & Branding Toolkit (slide […]