Browning bread, controversies and copies, a New Zealand history. By Michael Smythe.
Electrical appliances for browning bread in New Zealand began life in the 1930s as Kiwi copies of new-fangled products seen in overseas magazines. The import restrictions that spawned the copies provided a foundation for local manufacturing and were still in force as the first crop of industrial design graduates found their way into industry in the late 1960s.
When Gerry Luhman joined Zip Industries in 1968, the company was making a copy of an American pop-up toaster that reeked of ‘styling’ – the antithesis of ‘good design’. While Murray Kendon upgraded the mechanism, Gerry designed an impressively robust body that was much more suited to New Zealand manufacturing volumes and consistent with the hard-edged, confident Zip corporate identity that he had also designed. Reflecting his training at the hands of Nol ‘analysis, analysis, analysis’ Benner at the Wellington Polytechnic School of Design, his design was a rational response to the brief. Rather than being formed by an expensive press tool, the stainless steel was blanked, shallow-pressed and folded. The logical choice for the end panels was compression moulded phenolic resin. The new Zip toaster was a commercial success and met the standard required for the Design Council’s Designmark.
In 1995 the Wellington City Gallery mounted an exhibition called “Objects of Desire: selected New Zealand design” for which invited “practitioners, personalities and cultural commentators” to select one item each. Architect Gordon Moller chose the Zip toaster. In a catalogue essay, Douglas Lloyd Jenkins, a Carrington Polytechnic graduate, appeared to belittle “our first industrial designers”, who had emerged from Wellington Polytechnic and Elam in the late 1960s, when he wrote: "The individual prominence of these designers however, is beside the point … the aesthetic programme to which they prescribe almost requires anonymity. The result of this climate of internationalism was an industrial design that says little about the New Zealand condition – except that is, in the aesthetic concessions designers made to satisfy a conservative market."
It is true that Wellington Polytechnic design students were taught to eschew ego and self-expression and apply their creative skills to other people’s needs. They happily bought into the form-follows-function modernist ethos – project briefs informed the form and following trends was for fashion designers, not industrial designers! Lloyd Jenkins continued:
"At best the New Zealand [Industrial] Design Council sanctified ‘good design’ which centred on solving problems associated with the primary industries, for instance new transformers for electric fences. At worst the Council promoted compromised copies of international models, through the now largely forgotten Duke of Edinburgh Design Awards."
For the record, it was the Prince Philip Design Awards that our Design Council introduced – but not until 1981. Lloyd Jenkins offered no evidence to support his opinion. A review of PPDA finalists and winners reveals none that could be described as a “compromised copy” of an overseas product. Somehow the dismissive remarks were interpreted as implying that Gerry Luhman had produced a same-only-worse imitation of a German Braun toaster. Luhman, like any of his fellow graduates, would have regarded such a suggestion as the worst possible insult – anyone who copied, or styled, was simply not an industrial designer! Luhman had diligently designed from first principles only to have some audacious critic compare, but not contrast, his work with an existing product. Legal action ensued. A detailed account of the issues raised cannot be provided because the out of court settlement required those involved to speak no more of it.
One of Lloyd Jenkins’ lecturers at the Carrington course was Gifford Jackson who unapologetically embraced styling as part of design and astutely categorised its trends. Jackson would have described the style he applied to the four-slice pop-up toaster he designed for Ultimate Ecko in 1971 as ‘the new rationalism’. The reflector toaster designed in 1967, which catered for the sudden popularity of grilling toppings on toast, combined ‘taperform’ and ‘sheer look’ styling.
Ralta, a Palmerston North manufacturer of electrical appliances, entered the toaster race with something seen as refreshingly original – a design that flipped the toast out of each side instead of popping it out the top like most others. It can now be revealed that a Ralta executive brought samples back from the 1972 Cologne Fair. They were taken apart and the drawing office, which did not include an industrial designer, prepared working drawings. Ralta engineers wanted to make modifications to suit the less sophisticated equipment and lower volumes but the boss insisted on an exact copy: this was German design so how could New Zealanders possibly improve it?
The market responded well to the orange exterior, but it was unreliable in practice. Retailers were soon fielding complaints and Ralta withdrew the product. Was the Zip sideways-flip toaster, with its simple fault-free manual operation, New Zealand’s most original toaster design?

Ralta toaster with sideways flip action, copied from a German product circa 1972 (photograph: South Otago Museum).

Zip Automatic pop-up toaster, 1968, designed by Gerry Luhman and Murray Kendon (photograph: Art+Object).
Kiwi Nuggets stories are works in progress. Readers are invited to collaborate in the ongoing process of digging deeper, creating context and polishing perceptions. What we know, and what we still want to know, on each story will be posted on: www.creationz.co.nz
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: City Gallery, Wellington, for Objects of Desire catalogue. Ernie Norris, Bill Burnby and Roger Cheer for Ralta story. Designscape 12, March 1970, for ‘The High Style’ article by Gifford Jackson.







One Comment
Hi,
I am trying to find the manufacturer of Ultimate appliances in the 1950's and 60's. Do you know?
kind regards
Margaret Dagger